<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PACER Problems with Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/</link>
	<description>Technology for Lawyers, By Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Ramey</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-10976</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Ramey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-10976</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right. It sounds like the PDF program that&#039;s described in the article has an IE add-on which enables it to work in IE, but the program does not have a Firefox add-on. The article I linked to describes a general windows change that should work will all browsers without the add-on enabled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right. It sounds like the PDF program that&#8217;s described in the article has an IE add-on which enables it to work in IE, but the program does not have a Firefox add-on. The article I linked to describes a general windows change that should work will all browsers without the add-on enabled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-10971</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-10971</guid>
		<description>That looks like a Windows fix. No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks like a Windows fix. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Ramey</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-10970</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Ramey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-10970</guid>
		<description>I fixed it: http://www.shaneramey.com/programming/1-html/17-showtemppl-on-pacer-site-instead-of-pdf.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fixed it: <a href="http://www.shaneramey.com/programming/1-html/17-showtemppl-on-pacer-site-instead-of-pdf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shaneramey.com/programming/1-html/17-showtemppl-on-pacer-site-instead-of-pdf.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuestESQ</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-10967</link>
		<dc:creator>GuestESQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-10967</guid>
		<description>brilliant - thanks 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant &#8211; thanks<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>You can bill me if you can help me, but I consistently have a problem with PACER&#039;s efiling function wherein it will not allow the second case to be filed because it treats it as a repeat filing for the previous case, although everything is different.  I have tried renaming the pdf file to be uploaded, maxed out the temporary files space allowed, lowered the cookies security checks, (I use IE8), and I have even rolled back/reinstalled IE7 with no results.  I am really at a loss and I am serious about paying you for your time......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can bill me if you can help me, but I consistently have a problem with PACER&#8217;s efiling function wherein it will not allow the second case to be filed because it treats it as a repeat filing for the previous case, although everything is different.  I have tried renaming the pdf file to be uploaded, maxed out the temporary files space allowed, lowered the cookies security checks, (I use IE8), and I have even rolled back/reinstalled IE7 with no results.  I am really at a loss and I am serious about paying you for your time&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-2546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-2546</guid>
		<description>I use Hazel to rename the files automatically, which is a marginally less inelegant solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Hazel to rename the files automatically, which is a marginally less inelegant solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finis Price</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Finis Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great! You have no idea how much that confused me until I found the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great! You have no idea how much that confused me until I found the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Just what I was looking for!!!  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I was looking for!!!  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  This happens in Firefox 3.x, in both Mac and Linux (though not in every installation, for reasons unknown).  The show_temp.pl filesize looked suspiciously equivalent to what would have been the .pdf.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course the website proclaims the new IE 7.0, how it&#039;s wonderful, etc., ad nauseam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  This happens in Firefox 3.x, in both Mac and Linux (though not in every installation, for reasons unknown).  The show_temp.pl filesize looked suspiciously equivalent to what would have been the .pdf.</p>
<p>And of course the website proclaims the new IE 7.0, how it&#39;s wonderful, etc., ad nauseam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/law-office-use/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/technology/2008/12/03/pacer-problems-with-firefox/#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  This happens in Firefox 3.x, in both Mac and Linux (though not in every installation, for reasons unknown).  The show_temp.pl filesize looked suspiciously equivalent to what would have been the .pdf.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course the website proclaims the new IE 7.0, how it&#039;s wonderful, etc., ad nauseam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  This happens in Firefox 3.x, in both Mac and Linux (though not in every installation, for reasons unknown).  The show_temp.pl filesize looked suspiciously equivalent to what would have been the .pdf.</p>
<p>And of course the website proclaims the new IE 7.0, how it&#39;s wonderful, etc., ad nauseam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

