<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PDF Redaction Made Easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/</link>
	<description>Technology for Lawyers, By Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:33:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Good job, government: TSA manual leaked online, de-redacted very easily &#124; Technology Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Good job, government: TSA manual leaked online, de-redacted very easily &#124; Technology Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/?p=531#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s a number of ways to look at this. One, our government is completely incompetent, letting something so sensitive as the TSA manual just leak onto the Internet. Two, what a terrible job of redacting. Putting a black box over the sensitive text, rather than, you know, the actual process of redacting the document. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s a number of ways to look at this. One, our government is completely incompetent, letting something so sensitive as the TSA manual just leak onto the Internet. Two, what a terrible job of redacting. Putting a black box over the sensitive text, rather than, you know, the actual process of redacting the document. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good job, government: TSA manual leaked online, de-redacted very easily &#124; Products &#38; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Good job, government: TSA manual leaked online, de-redacted very easily &#124; Products &#38; Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/?p=531#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s a number of ways to look at this. One, our government is completely incompetent, letting something so sensitive as the TSA manual just leak onto the Internet. Two, what a terrible job of redacting. Putting a black box over the sensitive text, rather than, you know, the actual process of redacting the document. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s a number of ways to look at this. One, our government is completely incompetent, letting something so sensitive as the TSA manual just leak onto the Internet. Two, what a terrible job of redacting. Putting a black box over the sensitive text, rather than, you know, the actual process of redacting the document. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSIGEN Redaction</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>PSIGEN Redaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/?p=531#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>There are also some great automated technologies out there for higher volume redaction.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psigen.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scanning and Redaction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQyurD58sw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Redaction Video&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are also some great automated technologies out there for higher volume redaction.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.psigen.com" rel="nofollow">Scanning and Redaction</a><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQyurD58sw" rel="nofollow">Redaction Video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSIGEN Redaction</title>
		<link>http://www.technoesq.com/litigation/2009/01/06/pdf-redaction-made-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>PSIGEN Redaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoesq.com/?p=531#comment-734</guid>
		<description>There are also some great automated technologies out there for higher volume redaction.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psigen.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scanning and Redaction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQyurD58sw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Redaction Video&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are also some great automated technologies out there for higher volume redaction.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.psigen.com" rel="nofollow">Scanning and Redaction</a><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAQyurD58sw" rel="nofollow">Redaction Video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
