TechnoEsq Presentations
Be sure to check out TechnoEsq Presentations. We offer extremely affordable presentations for pre-suit, mediation and trial.

TrialPad 2.0 Review – Trial Presentation App for the iPad

***UPDATE – Please note that a video is posted in the comments below purporting to be TrialPad displaying the wrong exhibit on the display than that shown on the iPad. I have been in direct contact with the developers of TrialPad and neither they nor myself are able to reproduce this alleged “defect”. Upon closer examination, it appears the creator of this post and YouTube video is actually the developer of a competitor to TrialPad. I am currently investigating this and I will update this post accordingly.***
Hot on the heels of our review of Exhibit A, the first trial presentation app for the iPad to do callouts of exhibits, comes TrialPad’s new version, 2.0. Remember we interviewed the lead developer of TrialPad, Ian O’Flaherty, at the ABA TechShow 2011 where he showed us some amazing features such as multiple callouts of one exhibit as well as what has to be the best highlighting of documents (now with green, blue and pink highlights) of any trial presentation app for the iPad. Well Ian and the rest of the TrialPad team have been quite busy because they have a host of new features in version 2.0 that quite honestly make it well worth the wait. So let’s get down to what I think are the best new features.

CALLOUTS AND SPLIT SCREEN

As mentioned in our review of Exhibit A, any app which attempts to call itself a trial presentation app has to do callouts. These are the zoom in boxes attorneys use to ‘callout’ certain areas of an exhibit, say paragraph 3 of a document, so that the jury can focus on a particular part of the exhibit. While Exhibit A was the first to offer this ability but did so with some bugs, TrialPad has executed this feature flawlessly. Callouts are as simple as selecting the callout tool from the toolbox menu at the top of the screen and using your finger to select the area to zoom in on. What sets TrialPad apart from Exhibit A is the ability to not only do multiple callouts on one document, but to do have two documents on the screen (split screen) and do callouts from each of the exhibits simultaneously. Each callout can be moved around to difference positions on the screen by dragging with your finger.

As you can see, this sort of thing is imperative if you want to compare and contrast two versions of a document, say a contract, and bring the difference between them to the jury’s attention. In the example above you will notice that the annotations made to the underlying exhibit are shown in the callout as well (this has been lacking in some other apps which do callouts).

One suggestion I have however is that because TrialPad automatically sizes the callouts to the width of the screen, it can be a bit confusing when you have two callouts from separate exhibits to know which document each came from originally (since they are both the same size). One solution might be to have the callouts downsized a bit and shifted either to the right or left depending on from which exhibit it was called out.

Bottom line is that this feature was executed perfectly with TrialPad 2.0.

VIDEO CLIPS

While I knew the ability to play video on TrialPad 2.0 was going to be available, what I didn’t know was that we would be able to make video clips using TrialPad 2.0. Calling up a video is simple as they are accessible in the left hand pane under the “Video” tab. Once a video is selected it is loaded into the presentation area and ready to play. I have so far loaded a 4 GB deposition into TrialPad 2.0 and it literally was brought up instantly and ready to play. Play controls come up over the video just like they would when watching any video on your iPad, along with the ability to ‘push’ the video out to an AppleTV.

What is a surprise however is that below the video are two new icons. One to take a snapshot of the video from wherever the playhead is and the other to create a clip of the video. This is nice if you want to create a snapshot of a part of a video or want to create a clip on the fly of a portion of a deposition. When you press the clip button a “filmstrip” of the video opens up with the standard yellow brackets used by iMovie and the built-in video function of the iPAd, allowing you to trim your video to only play a certain portion of the video. The only problem is that the size of the editing window is a bit too small and it takes a couple of tries sometimes to get the clip to “trim” to exactly where you want it. Once you’re done trimming the video though, the resultant clip is saved in your list of Videos as a clip and you can use the edit button to rename the clip to anything you want. This is a killer feature and to be honest, one I hadn’t thought of putting into a trial presentation app on the iPad for fear the hardware could not handle it (forgetting that the iPad already lets you trim videos in the Video app and iMovie already).

WHITEBOARD

The other nice addition to TrialPad 2.0 and one which is certainly available in other trial presentation apps is a blank whiteboard for drawing. This was a feature TrialPad had to include in the new version and it has all of the standard features you would expect: multi-colored drawing pens with variable widths, the ability to erase and undo drawings and the ability to save the whiteboard, email it or add it to DropBox directly from TrialPad 2.0. This feature is quickly becoming a standard feature in these apps and it’s good to see TrialPad getting on board.

KEYNOTE VIEWING

While most developers will not understand why, TrialPad’s new feature of allowing keynote presentations to be displayed in TrialPad 2.0 is probably one of the most welcome for me as a Mac-using trial lawyer and fanatic fan of Apple’s Keynote. I don’t know of any other trial presentation app which will allow you to bring in Keynotes into the app and display them (it shows them slide by slide), annotate on them and save them using the HotDocs feature, but I was really excited when I saw this ability in TrialPad 2.0. Now when I want to bring in portions of my opening and show them to a witness, to demonstrate the jury the credibility of exactly the slide I showed them earlier, I can open my Keynote in TrialPad 2.0 and mark on the actual slide, emphasizing certain parts, etc… this was a really nice touch and another I didn’t expect from the new version.

There are many other new features to TrialPad 2.0, such as importing of PowerPoint slides, multi-page TIF’s, list view of cases, exporting of pages as PDF’s with or without annotations, moving exhibits between cases, multi-colored laser tool (one of my favorites) to name but a few. TrialPad has just risen the bar for other trial presentation apps with all of these new features and it will be exciting to see what this new competition will foster in this growing market!

TrialPad’s initial cost is $89.99, which is certainly higher than any of the other trial presentation apps out there. However, given the attention to detail in the user interface, highlight readability, split screen feature, multi-callout functions, and the rest, $89.99 is certainly worth the cost of the app.

We will be going to trial with TrialPad twice in July so be sure to check back here as we put TrialPad through its paces in a real court-room setting. We are looking forward to what all of these apps have to offer and are now even more excited for the iOS 5 update to come out bringing with it wireless displaying of these apps on the AppleTV.

  • Jay Vaughn

    So excited – updating mine tomorrow! Great review.

  • Howard Lenow

    Great review.  I am playing with TrialPad 2.0 and think it is an amazing upgrade.  I will be using it in some arbitrations in July and will write back with my own impressions.  I think $89 is a steal for the broad functionality of this new upgrade.  

  • Hans Poppe

    I’m buying it!  Now someone needs to invent a wireless interface between the ipad and the projector so I can walk around the courtroom with it and display docs as I do.

  • http://technoesqpresentations.com finis33

    You will be able to output everything from the iPad to the AppleTV wirelessly with iOS 5 in the Fall.

  • Cmorehead

    I have used Version 1.5 in Trial in Osceola County  and also just used it in two Mock Trials. Excellent performance. The version 2 upgrades are excellent.

  • http://www.trialpad.com Ian O’Flaherty

    Hi Finis,

    Thanks for your review. The AirPlay issue is causing a great debate at TrialPad HQ! I just put a post on our blog and wanted to see if you and your readers might care to share your AirPlay thoughts: http://www.trialpad.com/blog/?p=207

    Kind regards,

    Ian
    ————————————–
    Ian O’Flaherty
    ian@litsoftware.com
    Lit Software, LLC
    Developer of TrialPad for iPad

  • Stan179

    WARNING: TrialPad is a seriously flawed presentation app.  Do NOT try to use it in trial or you will get a mistrial.  The app puts up the wrong exhibits when in presentation mode.  There are other significant problems.   Here is a video I shot with my iPhone showing these problems:

    http://youtu.be/YfLVwOeQOF4

    I tried putting up a review in iTunes, warning of these problems, but some how TrialPad was able to take my review down.  They are not being honest about the problems they have.

    I also question the thoroughness of the law tech blogs that have reviewed TrialPad.  I bought it based on these reviews.  It does not seem they actually tried using the app in a presentation before posting their reviews, or they would have noticed these significant problems that make the app unusable. 

  • Finis

    Stan,

    I assume this is Stan Mortenson. Could you please email me about your problems you are having with TrialPad as well as Ian and the company? My review was based upon actual trial use and my own usage and have had no problems either with Ian O’Flaherty or TrialPad itself. 

  • Finis

    Stan,

    I assume this is Stan Mortenson. Could you please email me about your problems you are having with TrialPad as well as Ian and the company? My review was based upon actual trial use and my own usage and have had no problems either with Ian O’Flaherty or TrialPad itself. 

  • Stephen

    Finis; 
    The output to iOS5 is great for those very limited courtrooms but all the courtrooms where I practice still have (and will have for the future) VGA projectors.  As Hans suggested I would love a wireless interface for these areas.  Have you seen anything like it in the development stage?  

  • Guest

    These bugs seem to be legitimate regardless of the source.

    Ian should have never developed on Windows Vista.

  • http://www.trialpad.com Ian O’Flaherty

    It has come to my attention
    that a person with variations of the name “Stan Mortensen”, posing as an
    objective user, and even implying he is a litigator, is posting messages on a
    variety of blogs pointing out a bug that he says he has found in TrialPad 2.0.
    This is unfortunate since users may now have mistaken impressions about our app
    and our quality control process.

     

    Our
    users regularly contact our support [support@trialpad.com],
    or me directly, with questions they may have, which we address immediately.
    “Mr. Mortensen” did not contact me or our support, but went to the trouble of
    posting a questionable YouTube video with his concerns. It’s unclear exactly
    who “Stan Mortensen” is, though the competitiveness of the app development
    business, and a simple investigation has led me to the obvious conclusion.

     

    Our
    team will also be reaching out to the only attorneys we can find with names
    like “Stan Mortensen,” to make sure that they are not having any difficulties
    with TrialPad that need our personal attention, or are having their identity
    misappropriated.

     

    More
    importantly, while we’ve been unable to reproduce the issue that “Mr.
    Mortensen” reported, our investigation has uncovered one flaw which we are
    addressing immediately. Based on my years as a professional trial consultant,
    the flaw that “Mr. Mortensen” helped us find would in no way lead to the disastrous
    results he predicts. We’re on it, and there will be a quick update to resolve
    it. Lit
    Software is, and has always been, proactive and responsive to our users
    concerns.

     

    Please
    note that Lit Software, LLC, the developer of TrialPad for iPad,
    reaffirms here that our business practices will comply with the values of our
    joint venture partners, Kaufman, Rossin & Co. and Saurian Communications,
    Inc. We will conduct our business with integrity and take responsibility for
    our words and deeds, even in the Wild West of the blogosphere. After all, if
    we’re doing work that we’re proud of, our real names should be on it!

     

    Kind
    regards,

     

    Ian

     

    —————————————

    Ian
    O’Flaherty

    ian@litsoftware.com

    Lit
    Software, LLC

    Developer
    of TrialPad for iPad

  • Stan179

    Wow.  A witch hunt.  This is why people post under a pseudonym.  However, I am suprised that Finis is involved.  I have enjoyed your blog, and generally found it useful.  Don’t lose your journalistic integrety.  Acting as TrialPad’s tester and advisor may be leading to a loss of objectivity.

    You should easily be able to reproduce these serious bugs.  Here is my set up:  iPad 2, TrialPad 2.0, Samsung 46″ LCD HD TV (model # LN46D630M3FXZA) that I just bought from Best Buy for my conference room.

    If there is a problem with my set up, maybe you or TrialPad can publish a list of acceptable devices for running TrialPad?  Sure would have been nice to know this before I bought the TV or the app!  I have a Dell 5100MP projector I haven’t tried it one yet.  Will that work?

    Mr. O’Flaherty, ad hominem attacks aside, seems to have learned something from my posting, so hopefully we all benefit from this.

  • Michael

    I just used Exhibit A during a 2 week jury trial (we just got ourverdict 2 weeks ago), just when I heard the update came out forTrialPad.  It worked flawlessly during trial. Opposing counsel was soimpressed, he got the app and started to use it during trial. When Iheard about the trialpad update, I thought, gee, I should giveTrialPad a try and use it with my closing.  However, there wereproblems/bugs, specifically with callout, when I worked with it overthe weekend before closing. In addition, it was slower than Exhibit Afor exhibits coming into focus (is there something I’m doing wrong?).Also, the use of keynote in trialpad is somewhat misleading.  Ithought you could actually run a keynote presentation in trialpad(akin to powerpoint in trial director), but instead, you can copy theslides and put them in as exhibits, then manipulate them (if I’m wrongplease instruct on how to run a keynote presentation in TrialPad).  Ididn’t use it in my closing and stuck with Exhibit A, however, I wantto play around with TrialPad some more. The other problem I hope theycan fix, is the ability to save/export a document with callout, thatway we don’t have to keep calling out the same section over and overagain during trial.  My feeling is there should be a significantdifference in performance for an app that costs 9 times more than itscompetitor – shouldn’t the product be 9 times better?

  • Ian O’Flaherty

    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica}
    p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}
    span.s1 {letter-spacing: 0.0px}
    span.s2 {font: 12.0px ‘Myriad Pro’; letter-spacing: 0.0px}

    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica}
    p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}
    span.s1 {font: 12.0px ‘Myriad Pro’}

    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica}
    p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}
    span.s1 {letter-spacing: 0.0px}

    If you have found a product that works for you and you’re happy with, I would stick with it. And I would never recommend changing your presentation software mid-trial!

    If you have difficulties using TrialPad I would recommend contacting our support (our records show no contact from a Michael with your concerns).

    As to using Keynote in TrialPad, all our documentation states that Keynote files are supported but we recommend converting files to Adobe Acrobat to maintain the formatting and look of the original document. If you want to run a Keynote presentation I would recommend using Keynote.

    Not being able to save/export a document with a callout is not a problem, as much as it is a feature request. We have had one other user ask for this same ability.Kind regards,Ian

  • http://technoesqpresentations.com finis33

    I am in no way an adviser for TrialPad, merely wanting to reproduce your issues to verify the problem.

  • Max

    This article did a great job of highlighting some of the key features that TrialPad 2.0 has to offer.  As it stands, it is a great app that will only get better with time as more features are implemented.  I purchased 2.o several months ago and have used it at mediations and depositions, and intend to use at trial over the summer.  I have not had any problems projecting the displayed image as reported in the comments.